In our opinion the trial court improperly permitted testimony as to conversations between complainant and defendant’s brother (cf. People v. Buzzi, 238 N. Y. 390); and a new trial is required in the interests of justice. In view of the above determination, the appeal from the order is dismissed. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
275 A.D.2d 966
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Milton F. Sperber, Appellant.
People v. Sperber
275 A.D.2d 966
Case Details
275 A.D.2d 966
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!