522 F. App'x 222

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-10687

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 13, 2013.

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Matthew Rodriguez, Seagoville, TX, pro se.

*223Before SMITH, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Matthew Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Rodriguez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief, the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, and Rodriguez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the Appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th CiR. R. 42.2.

United States v. Rodriguez
522 F. App'x 222

Case Details

Name
United States v. Rodriguez
Decision Date
Jun 13, 2013
Citations

522 F. App'x 222

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!