Smiddy v. Varney 811 F.2d 504

811 F.2d 504

Gary D. SMIDDY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dudley D. VARNEY, Sidney Nuckles, Raymond Inglin, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 83-6507, 85-5687, 85-6007.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 25, 1987.

Richard M. Helgeson, Asst. City Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellants.

Talcott, Vandevelle & Woehrle, Michael Lightfoot and Carla Woehrle, Los Angeles, Cal, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GOODWIN and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, District Judge.*

ORDER

The petition for rehearing is granted in part.

The following language, reported at 803 F.2d 1473, first column, first full paragraph, eighth sentence, is deleted:

The city is entitled to recover its costs and attorneys’ fees in this court on its successful appeals.

The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. No active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. (Fed.R.App.P. 35.)

In all other respects the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied.

Smiddy v. Varney
811 F.2d 504

Case Details

Name
Smiddy v. Varney
Decision Date
Feb 25, 1987
Citations

811 F.2d 504

Jurisdiction
United States
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!