The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Yamhill Electric Co. v. City of McMinnville, 280 U. S. 531; Wabash R. R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.
281 U.S. 700
No. 674.
Holmes v. City of Fayetteville.
Jurisdictional statement submitted April 28, 1930.
Decided May 5, 1930.
Mr. A. L. Brooks for appellant. No appearance for appellee.
Holmes v. City of Fayetteville
281 U.S. 700
Case Details
281 U.S. 700
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!