210 N.C. 829

GURNEY P. HOOD, Commissioner of Banks, et al. v. E. D. ANDERSON et al.

(Filed 23 September, 1936.)

Appeal by defendants from Harris, J., at March Term, 1936, of Edgecombe.

Civil action to recover on two promissory notes.

*830Execution of notes admitted; also their nonpayment. Defendants allege, by way of set-off and counterclaim, damages for failure to make additional loans and to discount certain automobile purchasers’ notes.

From directed verdict for plaintiffs and judgment thereon the defendants appeal, assigning errors.

Gilliam & Bond for plaintiffs, appellees.

George M. Fountain & Son for defendants, appellants.

Per Curiam.

The ease is controlled by the decision in Elks v. Ins. Co., 159 N. C., 619, 75 S. E., 808. The evidence offered by the defendants fails to establish contract for breach of which the plaintiffs can be held in damages.

No error.

Hood v. Anderson
210 N.C. 829

Case Details

Name
Hood v. Anderson
Decision Date
Sep 23, 1936
Citations

210 N.C. 829

Jurisdiction
North Carolina

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!