This was a suit to foreclose a mortgage executed by Walter A. Bull and wife to secure a promissory note executed by the husband in 1884. The issue *363seems to have been the plea of the statute of limitations. The superior court found that payments had been made upon the note at sufficient intervals to prevent the bar of the statute. At the hearing of the cause counsel for respondents appeared, — counsel for the appellants not appearing,- — and moved for an affirmance of the judgment. An inspection of the record discloses that no statement of facts was filed; and the errors assigned, consisting of exceptions to the findings of fact, cannot he considered upon the record here. The judgment must therefore he affirmed.
22 Wash. 362
[No. 3325.
Decided April 10, 1900.]
J. J. Schlotfeldt et al., Respondents, v. Walter A. Bull et al., Appellants.
REVIEW ON APPEAL-EXCEPTIONS TO FINDINGS-STATEMENT OF FACTS.
Exceptions to findings of fact will not be reviewed on appeal, in the absence of a statement of facts.
Appeal from Superior Court, Kittitas County. — -Hon. John B. Davidson, Judge.
Affirmed.
H. J. Snively, for appellants.
Edward Pruyn and Graves & Englehart, for respondents.
Schlotfeldt v. Bull
22 Wash. 362
Case Details
22 Wash. 362
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!