93 N.H. 335

Hillsborough,

Mar. 6, 1945.

No. 3518.

Joseph Anthony Skavina v. Janet Skavina.

Chretien & Craig (Mr. Chretien orally), for the plaintiff.

Arthur B. Hayden and Osgood & Osgood (Mr. Hayden orally), for the defendant.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleges sufficient grounds for annulment. However, we deem it inexpedient to consider at this time the numerous allegations of fraud, some of which may not be sustained by the evidence. The contention that the plaintiff does not come into equity with “clean hands” is not conclusive. See 16 Minn. Law Rev. 215.

Exception sustained.

Branch, J., was absent.

Skavina v. Skavina
93 N.H. 335

Case Details

Name
Skavina v. Skavina
Decision Date
Mar 6, 1945
Citations

93 N.H. 335

Jurisdiction
New Hampshire

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!