37 Cust. Ct. 522

(Reap. Dec. 8666)

Entry Nos. A-249; A-86.

Kennedy Bros. Arms Company The Kennoc Company v. United States

(Decided October 3, 1956)

Wallace & Schwartz {Barnes, Richardson & Colburn by Joseph Schwartz and Edward N. Glad of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

George Cochran Doub, Assistant Attorney General {John J. Antus, special attorney), for the defendant.

Fokd, Judge:

When the two appeals listed in the attached schedule were called for a hearing, after being restored to the docket for the purpose of permitting evidence of United States value or cost of production, it was agreed between counsel that there was no freely offered foreign value, no freely offered export value, and that such or similar merchandise was not freely offered in the United States for domestic consumption, and that the cost of production for the articles in question was the appraised unit values, less 8 per centum Canadian sales tax.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, I find the cost of production of the involved merchandise to be the appraised unit values, less 8 per centum Canadian sales tax. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Kennedy Bros. Arms Co. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 522

Case Details

Name
Kennedy Bros. Arms Co. v. United States
Decision Date
Oct 3, 1956
Citations

37 Cust. Ct. 522

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!