Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order of December 17, 2003, we dismiss this appeal as premature. The order on appeal reserved jurisdiction to determine collateral source set-offs, thereby rendering it nonfinal. Even assuming that the reservation of jurisdiction to determine collateral source set-offs could be extinguished by the parties’ failure to file a motion seeking such set-offs, *1218and assuming this left nothing further for the court to determine, nevertheless, the instant order would still be nonfinal. See Neuman v. Neuman, 858 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Ponton v. Gross, 576 So.2d 910, 911 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
DISMISSED.
BARFIELD, KAHN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.