Our examination of the record in this case discloses evidence sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict. We find no error in the conduct of the trial or the District Court’s instructions to the jury.
The Order of the District Court will be affirmed.
277 F.2d 925
Thomas M. ANGLE v. Preston E. RHOADES and Daisy A. Rhoades, Individually, Jointly and Severally, Appellants. Myrtle ANGLE v. Preston E. RHOADES and Daisy A. Rhoades, Individually, Jointly and Severally, Appellants v. Thomas M. ANGLE, Third Party Defendant.
Nos. 13157, 13158.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued May 6, 1960.
Decided May 12, 1960.
Bernard Quinn, Erie, Pa. (Quinn, Leemhuis, Plate & Dwyer, Erie, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.
John G. Gent, William W. Knox, Erie, Pa. (Curtze & Gent, Erie, Pa., Harry F. Fleming, Detroit, Mich., Knox, Weber, *926Pearson & McLaughlin, Erie, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.
Before KALODNER, HASTIE and FORMAN, Circuit Judges.
Angle v. Rhoades
277 F.2d 925
Case Details
277 F.2d 925
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!