99 Ohio St. 3d 1415

[Cite as 05/16/2003 Case Announcements #3, 2003-0hio-2504.]

CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

May 16, 2003

APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2003-0427.

Gruelich v. The Hartford.

Cuyahoga App. No. 80987, 2003-Ohio-652.

Discretionary appeal denied on Proposition of Law No. I.TL Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., dissent, would allow Proposition of Law No. I, and would hold on this proposition of law for the decision in 2003-0302 and 2003-0362, Taylor v. Kemper Ins. Co., Cuyahoga App. No. 81360, 2003-Ohio-177.

Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. II and cause held for the decision in 2002-0579, Burkhart v. CNA Ins. Co., Stark App. No. 2001CA00265, 2002-0hio-903; briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Gruelich v. Hartford
99 Ohio St. 3d 1415

Case Details

Name
Gruelich v. Hartford
Decision Date
May 16, 2003
Citations

99 Ohio St. 3d 1415

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!