The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial 'was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
LuJce and Bloodworlh, JJ., concur.
18426.
Decided November 16, 1927.
W. N. Oliver, for plaintiff in error.
Robert McMillan, solicitor-general, contra.
The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial 'was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
LuJce and Bloodworlh, JJ., concur.
37 Ga. App. 380
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!