25 Cust. Ct. 325

No. 54900.

Crompton-Richmond Company, Inc. v. United States,

protest 162344-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

When the case was called for trial there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff. Counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the protest on the ground that it was untimely. An examination of the official papers revealed that more than 60 days elapsed between the date of liquidation of the entry and the date of the filing of protest. The protest was therefore dismissed as untimely.

Crompton-Richmond Co. v. United States
25 Cust. Ct. 325

Case Details

Name
Crompton-Richmond Co. v. United States
Decision Date
Nov 30, 1950
Citations

25 Cust. Ct. 325

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!