71 Ohio St. 3d 1489

Thursday, March 9, 1995

MERIT DOCKET

94-2407 and 94-2420.

State ex rel. Optimum Technology, Inc. v. Fisher. DLZ Corp. v. Fisher.

In Mandamus and Prohibition.

On motion to dismiss counterclaim of intervenor; motion to dismiss counterclaim of intervenor by DLZ Corp. et al.; motion to dismiss on suggestion of mootness by Attorney General; amended motion for protective order and to quash subpoena by James Conrad; motion to stay proceedings and discovery pending ruling on suggestion of mootness by Attorney General; motion to dismiss counterclaim of intervenor by Optimum Technology, Inc.; motion to dismiss counterclaim of intervenor; amended motion for protective order and to quash subpoena of James Comad filed by James Comad; motion to stay proceedings and discovery pending ruling on suggestion of mootness; and motion to dismiss on suggestion of mootness.

Motions to dismiss by Attorney General granted and all other motions denied as moot.

Causes dismissed.

Douglas, Wright, Resnick and Cook, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

State ex rel. Optimum Technology, Inc. v. Fisher
71 Ohio St. 3d 1489

Case Details

Name
State ex rel. Optimum Technology, Inc. v. Fisher
Decision Date
Mar 9, 1995
Citations

71 Ohio St. 3d 1489

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!