109 Ohio St. 3d 1509

2006-0235.

Olynyk v. Andrish.

Cuyahoga App. No. 86009, 2005-Ohio-6632. Reported at 109 Ohio St3.d 1420, 2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 531. On motion for reconsideration. Motion for reconsideration granted to the following extent:

The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed January 9, 2006:

“Whether the double dismissal rule contained in Rule 41(A) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure applies to plaintiffs voluntary dismissal of claims pursuant to Rule 41(A)(2) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure.”

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

The conflict case is Van Beusecum v. Continental Builders, Delaware App. No. 04-CAE-01-008, 2004-Ohio-7261.

*1510Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2006-0310, Olynyk v. Andrish, Cuyahoga App. No. 86009, 2005-Ohio-6632.

Olynyk v. Andrish
109 Ohio St. 3d 1509

Case Details

Name
Olynyk v. Andrish
Decision Date
Jun 21, 2006
Citations

109 Ohio St. 3d 1509

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!