MEMORANDUM **
Richart Miguel Gutierrez Cadena and Zoila Del Rosario Gutierrez, natives and citizens of Ecuador, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and review de novo constitutional claims. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion because they presented insufficient evidence to establish prejudice. See id. at 793-94 (petitioner must demonstrate prejudice to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim). It follows that petitioners’ due process claim fails. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.