Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court correctly held that the executory land contract did not affect plaintiff’s insurable interest or the amount recoverable under the fire insurance policy (see, Insurance Law § 3402). The insurable interest of the vendor in a land contract is the full value of the insured property (Rosenbloom v Maryland Ins. Co., 258 App Div 14; see also, First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn, v Nichols, 33 AD2d 259). That the land contract placed the risk of loss on the vendee does not eliminate such interest (see, Meade v North Country Co-Op. Ins. Co., 120 AD2d 834, 836-837). Defendant improperly relies on case law involving mortgagees’ rights under fire insurance policies (e.g., Whitestone Sav. & Loan Assn, v Allstate Ins. Co., 28 NY2d 332; Heilbrunn v German Alliance Ins. Co., 150 App Div 670, appeal dismissed 206 NY 683). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Notaro, J. — Insurance Proceeds.) Present— Denman, P. J., Boomer, Boehm, Fallon and Davis, JJ.
182 A.D.2d 1070
Andrew Johnson, Respondent, v New York Mutual Underwriters Insurance Company, Appellant.
Johnson v. New York Mutual Underwriters Insurance
182 A.D.2d 1070
Case Details
182 A.D.2d 1070
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!