Considering the charge of the court as á whole, in the light of the evidence, there is no substantial merit in either of the two special grounds of the motion for a new trial; and since there was testimony to sustain the-verdict, the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
*434Action for damages; from city court of Savannah — Judge Davis Freeman. June 12, 1915.
Oliver & Oliver, for plaintiff in error.
Fred T. Saussy, contra.