216 A.D.2d 893 629 N.Y.S.2d 697

David M. Knight et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Conopco, Inc., Respondent-Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff. Vanderlinde Electric Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

[629 NYS2d 697]

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240 because there is a question of fact whether the alleged violation of the statute was a proximate cause of the injuries allegedly sustained by David M. Knight (plaintiff) (see, Rossi v Main-South Hotel Assocs., 168 AD2d 964). The court did not abuse its discretion in granting in part the motions of defendant and third-party defendant to compel disclosure of video evidence concerning the entertainment activities of plaintiff after the date of the accident. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J.—Labor Law.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Knight v. Conopco, Inc.
216 A.D.2d 893 629 N.Y.S.2d 697

Case Details

Name
Knight v. Conopco, Inc.
Decision Date
Jun 9, 1995
Citations

216 A.D.2d 893

629 N.Y.S.2d 697

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!