226 F. App'x 8

Kareemah Yasmina BELL, Appellant v. Valerie KITCHINGS, Department of Employment Services, Appellee.

No. 07-7024.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

June 14, 2007.

Kareemah Yasmina Bell, Washington, DC, pro se.

Edward Eugene Schwab, Deputy Attorney General, Office of Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Office of the Solicitor General, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

BEFORE: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and BROWN and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 9, 2007, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because it is not a civil action arising under federal law, see 28 U.S.C. § 1331, or between citizens of different states with an amount in controversy of more than $75,000, see 28 U.S.C. § 1332; nor does the complaint allege any *9other basis for the district court’s jurisdiction.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 86, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Bell v. Kitchings
226 F. App'x 8

Case Details

Name
Bell v. Kitchings
Decision Date
Jun 14, 2007
Citations

226 F. App'x 8

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!