165 Okla. 301

RALPH v. PETERS et al.

No. 24884.

Oct. 10, 1933.

R. O. Ingle, for plaintiff in error.

Roy Frye, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

This action was commenced in the district court of Sequoyah *302county March 11, 1931, and on the 3rd day of January, 1983, a judgment was rendered for the defendant Francis M. Clark, for the possession of the premises involved in the action. A petition in error with case-made attached was filed July 27, 1933, and on August 12, 1933, a motion to dismiss was filed by the defendant Francis M. Clark. This motion alleges that the case-made fails to contain a copy of the final order or judgment sought to be reviewed; that the record filed herein fails to have incorporated an order of the trial court overruling motion for new trial; that the record fails to contain a recital of a notice of intention to appeal. An examination of the record discloses that these allegations are supported by the facts. Either one of these grounds is equally fatal to the appeal. Smith v. Fash, 122 Okla. 104, 251 P. 496; Lillard v. Meisberger, 113 Okla. 228, 240 P. 1067.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Ralph v. Peters
165 Okla. 301

Case Details

Name
Ralph v. Peters
Decision Date
Oct 10, 1933
Citations

165 Okla. 301

Jurisdiction
Oklahoma

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!