280 A.D.2d 955 720 N.Y.S.2d 871

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Doud, Appellant.

[720 NYS2d 871]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court abused its discretion by failing *956to grant him an adjournment to permit him to call a defense witness. “Defendant failed to demonstrate that [the] witness[] would provide testimony that was material and favorable to the defense” (People v Tillman, 261 AD2d 854, 855, lv denied 93 NY2d 980; see, People v Benson, 260 AD2d 864, 865, lv denied, 93 NY2d 966). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the court failed to marshall the evidence in an even-handed manner (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Yates County Court, Falvey, J. — Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

People v. Doud
280 A.D.2d 955 720 N.Y.S.2d 871

Case Details

Name
People v. Doud
Decision Date
Feb 7, 2001
Citations

280 A.D.2d 955

720 N.Y.S.2d 871

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!