Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Noe Ivan Alvizu-Cedillo raises argu*428merits that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
216 F. App'x 427
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Noe Ivan ALVIZU-CEDILLO, also known as Jose Ivan Alvizo-Cedilla, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-50722
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 7, 2007.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Alvizu-Cedillo
216 F. App'x 427
Case Details
216 F. App'x 427
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!