On the authority of Kelso v. Norton, 65 Kan. 778, 70 Pac. 896, 93 Am. St. Rep. 308, and Henthorn v. Security Co., 70 Kan. 808, 79 Pac. 653, this case is affirmed. Under the uncontroverted facts, the only legal right, if any, the plaintiff has in the land in question is to redeem and have an accounting for rents.
73 Kan. 793 •
83 Pac. 1116
Sarah G. Shattuck v. Belknap Savings Bank et al.
No. 14,487.
(83 Pac. 1116.)
Error from Harvey district court; Peter J. Galle, judge.
Opinion filed February 10, 1906.
Affirmed.
S. W. Shattuck, jr., for plaintiff in erro'r.
Whitcomb & Hamilton, for defendants in error.
Shattuck v. Belknap Savings Bank
73 Kan. 793 •
83 Pac. 1116
Case Details
73 Kan. 793
83 Pac. 1116
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!