21 Ind. App. 177

The State, ex rel. Whistler, Guardian, v. Herod et al.

[No. 2,652.

Filed November 18, 1898.]

Appeal. — Sustaining Demurrer to Complaint Not a Final Judgment. —Sustaining a demurrer to a complaint is not a final judgment, and from such ruling alone, without further action of the court, an appeal will not lie.

From the Boone Circuit Court.

Appeal dismissed.

A. J. Shelby and C. M. Zion, for appellant.

S. M. Ralston and Michael Keefe, for appellees.

Black, J.

The question earnestly argued by counsel is not properly before us. The rulings of the court sustaining demurrers of the appellees to the complaint of the appellant are assigned as errors. In the transcript of the record filed in this court such rulings, with the exceptions thereto of the appellant, are shown, but no further proceedings are set forth in the transcript. What final judgment, if any, was rendered does not appear. Sustaining a demurrer to a complaint is not a final judgment, and from such ruling alone, without the further action of the court, an appeal will not lie. Brannock v. Stocker, 76 Ind. 573; Slagle v. Bodmer, 58 Ind. 465; Thomas v. Chicago, etc., R. Co., 139 Ind. 462; Gray v. Singer, 137 Ind. 257; Champ v. Kendrick, 130 Ind. 545; City of Jeffersonville v. Tomlin, 7 Ind. App. 681; Masten v. Indiana, etc., Co., 19 Ind. App. 633; Foster v. Lindley, 20 Ind. App. 155.

Appeal dismissed.

State ex rel. Whistler v. Herod
21 Ind. App. 177

Case Details

Name
State ex rel. Whistler v. Herod
Decision Date
Nov 18, 1898
Citations

21 Ind. App. 177

Jurisdiction
Indiana

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!