31 Wash. 684

[No. 4470.

Decided February 7, 1903.]

C. A. Loy et al., Respondents, v. C. P. Coey, Appellant.

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. Whxiam E. Richardson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.

Moore & Corbett, for appellant.

A. J. Laughon, for respondents.

Pee Curiam.

— The respondent moves to dismiss this appeal for the reason that the alleged appeal hond is ineffectual, in that the penalty of said bond, which purports to be an appeal and supersedeas bond, is not double the amount of the judgment and $200, required by the statute for bond on appeal. This case falls squarely within the rule announced in Pierce v. Willeby, 20 Wash. 129 (54 Pac. 999); Town of Sumner v. Rogers, 21 Wash. 361 (58 Pac. 214); Galloway v. Tjossem, 22 Wash. 163 (60 Pac. 129); Beezley v. Sessions, 22 Wash. 125 (60 Pac. 130); and Graham v. American Surely Co., 28 Wash. 735 (69 Pac. 365).

The motion will be sustained, and the appeal dismissed.

Loy v. Coey
31 Wash. 684

Case Details

Name
Loy v. Coey
Decision Date
Feb 7, 1903
Citations

31 Wash. 684

Jurisdiction
Washington

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!