Cephas Brewer appeals the district court’s1 adverse decision in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Anderson v. Larson, 327 F.3d 762, 767 (8th Cir.2003), we find Brewer’s arguments lack merit, and we affirm on the basis that the action is barred under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). See 8th Cir. R. 47B. However, we modify the judgment to be a dismissal without prejudice. See Sheldon v. Hundley, 83 F.3d 231, 234 (8th Cir.1996).
97 F. App'x 70
Cephas Barton BREWER, Appellant, v. Cary ANDERSON, Benton County Judge; Benton County Quorum Court, Appellees.
No. 03-3361.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted May 7, 2004.
Decided May 21, 2004.
Cephas Barton Brewer, Pine Bluff, AR, pro se.
Michael R. Rainwater, Scott Paris Richardson, Jason E. Owens, Duncan & Rainwater, Little Rock, AR, for DefendantsAppellees.
Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
Brewer v. Anderson
97 F. App'x 70
Case Details
97 F. App'x 70
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!