Under all the facts of the case as disclosed by the record, this court is unable to hold that the judge of the superior court abused his discretion in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
39 Ga. App. 135
19339.
Daniel v. The State.
Decided January 15, 1929.
C. G. Battle, for plaintiff in error.
Carlton W. Binns, solicitor, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeCraw, contra.
Daniel v. State
39 Ga. App. 135
Case Details
39 Ga. App. 135
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!