207 S.W.3d 725

Leroy K. BRIGGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 66209.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 12, 2006.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for respondent.

Before HOWARD, C.J., and BRECKENRIDGE, and HOLLIGER, JJ.

Order

PER CURIAM.

The current appeal involves a single issue: did the motion court clearly err by denying appellant Leroy Briggs’s motion for an evidentiary hearing under Rule 24.035. Briggs claims his guilty plea entered after mistrial was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent because he feared returning to trial with an unprepared attorney and spending additional time at the county jail. Therefore, he claims, his guilty plea is subject to vacation under Rule 24.035.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Briggs v. State
207 S.W.3d 725

Case Details

Name
Briggs v. State
Decision Date
Dec 12, 2006
Citations

207 S.W.3d 725

Jurisdiction
Missouri

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!