188 A.D.2d 1042

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Martin Isenberg, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law, motion granted and indictment dismissed. Memorandum: County Court erred by denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. The sketchy details provided in the handwritten statement signed by the confidential informant did not constitute a summary of the informant’s examination by the issuing Magistrate "recorded or summarized on the record by the court” (CPL 690.40 [1]). Because we conclude there was not substantial compliance with CPL 690.40, the evidence discovered during the search authorized by the defective warrant must be suppressed (see, People v Taylor, 73 NY2d 683, 690).

*1043In view of our determination, we do not reach defendant’s other contentions. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kasler, J., trial; Erie County Court, Drury, J., suppression hearing — Criminal Possession Marihuana, 2nd Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

People v. Isenberg
188 A.D.2d 1042

Case Details

Name
People v. Isenberg
Decision Date
Dec 30, 1992
Citations

188 A.D.2d 1042

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!