This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent-defendant and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his *536appeal, and the defendant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted and the order or judgment is hereby affirmed.
260 So. 2d 535
Harlis PITMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 71-1403.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 18, 1972.
Harlis Pitman, in pro. per.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
Pitman v. State
260 So. 2d 535
Case Details
260 So. 2d 535
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!