I find, as a matter of fact, that the Penacook Manufacturing Company, one of the defendants, and the mortgagor under whom the other defendant holds in this case, is-*815in default for nonpayment of interest coupons on tlie mortgage bonds. I also find that the mortgage or conditional deed in suit: was for the purpose of securing the payment of 50 81,000 bonds therein mentioned; that the reason for executing the mortgage or conditional deed was to raise money by selling* these bonds in the markets or elsewhere, and it was a part of the arrangement that the mortgagee, who is this plaintiff, should become the trustee of the interests of all parties under the mortgage, and those who might become the owners of bonds. The bonds were not sold to any considerable oxtenl, but the mortgagee loaned tbe mortgagor something like $25,000, taking the mortgage and the bonds as collateral security. The mortgagee, after default in payment of interest con-pons upon the bonds, and properly for the purpose of taking the steps necessary to a foreclosure, requested the bonds to be sold at public auction: and the same were sold, and bought by the mortgagee. No money was actually paid by the mortgagee for the bonds, but it was intended to apply the auction purchase price on the noies which the mortgagee held against the mortgagor. 1 find ilie mortgagee acted in good faith in respect to the transaction of sale, but with full notice of all the equities existing under the mortgage, and therefore is not a bona fide holder, in the sense of being in a position to insist uuon the absolute provisions in the mortgage in respect to forfeiture.
After hearing, Edward W. Houghton, of Stillriver, Mass., Howard E. Faulkner, of West Acton, Mass., and Gertrude EL Dickinson, of Xewtonviile, Mites., who set themselves up as bondholders, asked leave to intervene as parties.
The intervening bondholders are admitted as parties, to the end that they may protect their interest under the mortgage. Of course, the foreclosure must go upon the mortgage, and the default has reference to the bonds described therein. Under section 1 of chapter IBS) of the Public Statutes of New Hampshire, this deed and bond arrangement must be treated as a mortgage, and the foreclosure proceedings must go upon the ordinary lines of foreclosure proceedings in the New Hampshire sinie courts. Although the mortgage was to secure $50,000' of bonds, as a matter of fact the bonds under the mortgage were not sold, and are not outstanding, to any substantial extent. So far as it appears, all the bonds, except those held by the parties who seek to intervene, are held by the plaintiff, the mortgagee. The holding originally being as collateral security is now by virtue of the sale. The .sale was sufficiently wiihin what was contemplated by the mortgage contract arrangement to be treated as valid for purposes of maintaining this suit; but the mortgagee, who ivas the trustee, and who now holds the bonds under the sale, took them with full nolice of all the equities, and has no standing beyond the amount represented by the actual indebtedness. Holding it as collateral security, and having taken the required steps to that end, the trustee may foreclose the mortgage for the purpose of perfect*816ing and realizing upon bis security, but tbe security cannot extend beyond tbe actual indebtedness. There will be judgment of foreclosure for tbe plaintiff, wbicb foreclosure is for the benefit of tbe actual indebtedness from tbe mortgagor to tbe mortgagee, and for tbe benefit of tbe intervening bondholders as well.
Unless tbe parties object on tbe ground that be is assistant clerk, Burns P. Hodgman is appointed commissioner to ascertain the amount actually due from tbe mortgagor to tbe mortgagee on tbe actual note indebtedness for which tbe mortgage and bonds were collateral security. He will also ascertain and report tbe amount of coupons due and unpaid at tbe date of tbe writ. This amount, however, is not to be included in tbe judgment of foreclosure. He will also ascertain tbe number and amount of bonds held by tbe intervening bondholders. This should be done at once, on short notice, and tbe parties will probably assent to appearing before the commissioner informally and without delay. After tbe commissioner reports, tbe judgment will be tbe usual conditional judgment in New Hampshire, unless parties point but that tbe property should and can be sold under the New Hampshire law, and the proceeds divided between tbe plaintiff and tbe other bondholders according to their equitable rights.
The foreclosure judgment being based upon tbe bonds and tbe mortgage to secure tbe same, but, on equity grounds, being reduced to tbe amount of tbe notes and interest, the bonds and tbe mortgage held by tbe plaintiff, together with tbe notes, become tbe foundation of the foreclosure judgment, and must be delivered to tbe clerk to be canceled. And this is for the reasbn that tbe plaintiff, as trustee, takes tbe judgment of foreclosure as representing all his indebtedness, and all tbe right and interest wbicb it has in tbe property mortgaged. Tbe plaintiff’s counsel, Mr. Branch, will file a draft decree, drawn upon tbe lines of these suggestions. If it is tbe practice in New Hampshire for decree to be entered before assessment of damages by a commissioner, judgment of foreclosure may be entered as of the day when tbe plaintiff shall elect to take it. If, under tbe practice, computation and assessment of damages must first be made, judgment may be entered as of tbe day when such assessment is filed in tbe clerk’s office. Tbe equitable relation wbicb tbe bonds of tbe intervening bondholders and that of tbe plaintiff’s judgment sustain to tbe property and to each other will be determined upon application and proper proceedings later.