It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.
172 Conn. 693
State of Connecticut v. Nathan Arrington
Argued December 7
decided December 7, 1976
Donald A. Browne, state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).
No appearance for the appellant (defendant).
State v. Arrington
172 Conn. 693
Case Details
172 Conn. 693
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!