172 Conn. 693

State of Connecticut v. Nathan Arrington

Argued December 7

decided December 7, 1976

Donald A. Browne, state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

No appearance for the appellant (defendant).

It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.

State v. Arrington
172 Conn. 693

Case Details

Name
State v. Arrington
Decision Date
Dec 7, 1976
Citations

172 Conn. 693

Jurisdiction
Connecticut

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!