Hunley v. Industrial Commission 23 Ariz. App. 392, 533 P.2d 700

23 Ariz. App. 392 • 533 P.2d 700

533 P.2d 700

Emogene HUNLEY, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Verkamp's, Respondent Employer, State Compensation Fund, Respondent Carrier.

No. 1 CA-IC 1081.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

April 10, 1975.

Review Granted May 6, 1975.

Jerome & Gibson, P. C., by D. A. Jerome, Phoenix, for petitioner.

Edward F. Cummerford, Chief Counsel The Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.

Robert K. Park, Chief Counsel State Compensation Fund by James B. Long, Phoenix, for respondents employer and carrier.

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

STEVENS, Judge.

This Court filed its opinion in the above-entitled matter on 11 February 1975. 23 Ariz.App. 176, 531 P.2d 552. A timely motion for rehearing and response thereto have been filed. The motion correctly advises the Court that the cases of Mahan v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 14 Ariz.App. 535, 484 P.2d 1064 (1971), and Washburn v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 14 Ariz.App. 479, 484 P.2d 248 (1971), (23 Ariz.App. at 177, 531 P.2d at 553) do not support the principle of law for which they are cited. We acknowledge this error on our part. This does not affect the result.

The motion for rehearing is herewith denied.

NELSON, P. J., and WREN, J., concurring.

Hunley v. Industrial Commission
23 Ariz. App. 392 • 533 P.2d 700

Case Details

Name
Hunley v. Industrial Commission
Decision Date
Apr 10, 1975
Citations

23 Ariz. App. 392

533 P.2d 700

Jurisdiction
Arizona
Court
Arizona Court of Appeals

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!