94 F. App'x 10

Lee Allen BUNCH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DANBURY POLICE DEPT., I/O; Louis Ramos, Detective, I/O; Robert Burnetti, States’ Atty, I/O, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 03-0079.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 6, 2004.

Lee Allen Bunch, Jr., Danbury, CT (on submission), for Appellant, pro se.

Michael F. O’Connor, Williams, Walsh & O’Connor, LLC, North Haven, CT, for Appellees Danbury Police Department and Detective Louis Ramos.

Present: JACOBS, STRAUB, and B.D. PARKER, Jr., Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

Lee Allen Bunch, Jr. appeals from the judgment entered in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Chatigny, /.), granting summary judgment in favor of the Danbury Police Department and Detective Louis Ramos.1 *11Familiarity is assumed as to the facts, the procedural context, and the specification of appellate issues.

“This Court reviews the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo” and “will affirm the decision only if the record indicates that ‘there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.’” Tenenbaum v. Williams, 193 F.3d 581, 593 (2d Cir.1999) (quoting Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c)).

For substantially the reasons stated by the district court, it properly granted summary judgment.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Bunch v. Danbury Police Dept.
94 F. App'x 10

Case Details

Name
Bunch v. Danbury Police Dept.
Decision Date
Apr 6, 2004
Citations

94 F. App'x 10

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!