The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.
93 Ohio St. 3d 501
The State ex rel. Mays, Appellant, v. Miami Valley Masonry, Inc. et al., Appellees.
[Cite as State ex rel. Mays v. Miami Valley Masonry, Inc. (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 501.]
(No. 01-690
Submitted September 18, 2001
Decided October 31, 2001.)
Butkovich, Schimpf, Schimpf & Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., James A. Whittaker and Stephen P. Gast, for appellant.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jacob Dobres, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.
dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.
Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
State ex rel. Mays v. Miami Valley Masonry, Inc.
93 Ohio St. 3d 501
Case Details
93 Ohio St. 3d 501
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!