220 So. 2d 1

HAYNES PAINTING & DECORATING and Phoenix Assurance Company, Petitioners, v. Lora MOSLEY and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 38168.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 12, 1969.

Rehearing Denied March 31, 1969.

Walsh & Dolan, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioners.

Harry Goodmark and Plisco & Zalla, West Palm Beach, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari, we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 4, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition for certiorari is therefore denied.

Attorneys’ fees in the amount of $250.00 are awarded to respondent-Lora Mosley’s attorneys.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.

Haynes Painting & Decorating v. Mosley
220 So. 2d 1

Case Details

Name
Haynes Painting & Decorating v. Mosley
Decision Date
Mar 12, 1969
Citations

220 So. 2d 1

Jurisdiction
Florida

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!