Ingrid Driskell, counsel for Dwain Williams has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Williams’s sentences are AFFIRMED.
548 F. App'x 606
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dwain D. WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-12440
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Dec. 18, 2013.
John Alexander Romano, Mi Yung Claire Park, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, James N. Crane, Leah E. McEwen, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Albany, GA, Michael J. Moore, Michelle Lee Schieber, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Macon, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Dwain D. Williams, Tucson, AZ, pro se.
Before WILSON, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Williams
548 F. App'x 606
Case Details
548 F. App'x 606
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!