638 F. App'x 241

Keith BARKLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of MARYLAND; Csm O’Leary, Defendants-Appellees, and Kathleen Green, Warden, Defendant.

No. 15-7495.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 29, 2016.

Decided: March 15, 2016.

Keith Barkley, Appellant Pro Se. Michael O’Connor Doyle, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel-lees.

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith Barkley appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barkley v. Maryland, No. 1:14-cv-00399-GLR, 2015 WL 5165903 (D.Md. Sept. 2, 2015). We dispense with oral argument *242because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Barkley v. Maryland
638 F. App'x 241

Case Details

Name
Barkley v. Maryland
Decision Date
Mar 15, 2016
Citations

638 F. App'x 241

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!