Order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present-—-Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ.
233 A.D. 702
Mrs. Marcus J. Katz, Respondent, v. Sacul Realty Co., Inc., Appellant.
Katz v. Sacul Realty Co.
233 A.D. 702
Case Details
233 A.D. 702
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!