The questions involved in this case are, in all substantial respects, like those in the case of Moseley v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 57 Neb. 636. The judgment in this case will therefore be tiie same as in the Moseley Case.
Reversed and remanded.
57 Neb. 641
Willard E. Stewart et al., appellants, v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, appellee.
Filed February 9, 1899.
No. 8714.
Stare Decisis. This case is ruled by Moseley v. OMcago, B. & Q. B. Go,, 57 Neb. 636, the questions for decision in both cases being substantially identical. - . ;
Appeal from the district court of Lancaster county. Heard below before Holmes, J.
Reversed.
Webster, Rose & Fisherdich and Willard F. Stewart, for appellants.
J. W. Deweese, F. E. Bishop, and John H. Ames, contra.
Stewart v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
57 Neb. 641
Case Details
57 Neb. 641
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!