49 A.D.3d 652 852 N.Y.S.2d 805

In the Matter of Pamela Robinson, Appellant, v Paul Bennett, Respondent.

[852 NYS2d 805]

The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual determination to be resolved by the Family Court (see Matter of Hall v Hall, 45 AD3d 842, 843 [2007]; Matter of Waaldijk-Howell v Howell, 22 AD3d 675 [2005]; Matter of King v Flowers, 13 AD3d 629 [2004]). The Family Court’s credibility determination is entitled to great weight on appeal (see Matter of Hall v Hall, 45 AD3d at 843; Matter of Waaldijk-Howell v Howell, 22 AD3d at 675; Matter of King v Flowers, 13 AD3d at 629). The record supports the Family Court’s determination that the petitioner failed to prove, by a fair preponderance of the credible evidence, that the respondent committed an act constituting a family offense (see Family Ct Act § 832; Matter of Hall v Hall, 45 AD3d at 842-843; Matter of Waaldijk-Howell v Howell, 22 AD3d at 675; Matter of King v Flowers, 13 AD3d at 629). Mastro, J.P., Covello, Eng and Belen, JJ., concur.

Robinson v. Bennett
49 A.D.3d 652 852 N.Y.S.2d 805

Case Details

Name
Robinson v. Bennett
Decision Date
Mar 11, 2008
Citations

49 A.D.3d 652

852 N.Y.S.2d 805

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!