The acceptance of the reduced basement would be a consideration for the reduction of the rent, and it was a question of fact for the jury whether the agreement of reduction on that consideration was made. Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.
98 N.Y.S. 1113
PERLSTEIN, Respondent, v. HELMAN, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
March 9, 1906.)
Action by Myer S. Perlstein against Bertha Helman.
Perlstein v. Helman
98 N.Y.S. 1113
Case Details
98 N.Y.S. 1113
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!