66 Kan. 784 71 P. 1126

Martin Coryell v. The Bank of Fort Scott et al.

No. 12,994.

(71 Pac. 1126.)

Error from Allen district court; L. Stillwell, judge.

Opinion filed March 7, 1903.

Affirmed.

J. M. Humphrey, and J. S. West, for plaintiff in error.

J. D. Mg Cleverly, and W. W. Padgett, for Bank of Fort Scott and Hart Pioneer Nurseries, and Biddle c& Lardner, for Combs and Pearsall.

Per Curiam:

The case-made herein does not contain all the evidence or all the pleadings; the demurrer to the evidence is omitted. A contract introduced by defendants *785below, referred to in the testimony as “Exhibit E,” and another, as “Exhibit Gf,” are omitted, although the record contains blank spaces for their insertion. They are said in the briefs to be guaranties by the bank and the Hart Nursery Company. We are, therefore, left to consider whether the findings of the court support the judgment. It was found that neither the nursery corporation nor the bank assumed or agreed to pay the note of plaintiff in error. We have examined the conclusions of fact and cannot say that the judgment is not sustained by them.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Coryell v. Bank of Fort Scott
66 Kan. 784 71 P. 1126

Case Details

Name
Coryell v. Bank of Fort Scott
Decision Date
Mar 7, 1903
Citations

66 Kan. 784

71 P. 1126

Jurisdiction
Kansas

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!