Affirmed. As found by the trial court, the postconviction motion is successive and untimely. Even if it were not, it fails to show Strickland1 prejudice as a matter of law. See Sanders v. State, 946 So.2d 953, 960 (Fla.2006) (“[A]s a matter of law, the possibility of a jury pardon cannot form the basis for a finding of prejudice under Strickland”).
WARNER, FARMER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.