1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 4

Samuel Feinberg vs. Clair Taylor et al

Eq. No. 3569

October 17, 1917

TANNER, P. J.

This case is heard upon the petition of the creditor that the receiver be ordered to pay the dividend ordered by the Court without requiring from the creditor a release against said trust estate or the *5trustees thereof, or any other conditions attached to .the payment of said dividend.

For complainant: A. S. & A. P. Johnson.

For respondent: Wilson, Gardner & Churchill and H. B. Agard.

The decree upon which the receiver tendered payment does not appear to be a final decree releasing the receiver or the trust estate from all liability. In the absence of such a decree we do not think that the receiver can require any such release as he has insisted upon in the case.

Feinberg v. Taylor
1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 4

Case Details

Name
Feinberg v. Taylor
Decision Date
Oct 17, 1917
Citations

1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 4

Jurisdiction
Rhode Island

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!