The question on this appeal involves an issue of fact, and the verdict of the jury was a result reasonably reached on a permissible view of the evidence.
There is no error.
House, C. J., Ryan, Shapiro, Loiselle and MacDonald, Js.
Argued June 7
decided June 8, 1972
Homer G. Scoville, with whom, on the brief, was Harvey A. Katz, for the appellant (named plaintiff).
Snow G. Mwiford, for the appellee (defendant).
The question on this appeal involves an issue of fact, and the verdict of the jury was a result reasonably reached on a permissible view of the evidence.
There is no error.
163 Conn. 608
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!