247 N.C. 395

STATE v. JAMES DAVID HAIRSTON

(Filed 11 December, 1957)

Attorney General Patton and Assistant Attorney General Bruton for the State.

Broton, Scurry, McMichael & Griffin and Pemberton & Blackwell for defendant appellant.

*396Per Curiam.

Defendant is concluded by beginning compliance with the terms of the judgment rendered in May 1956. S. v. Canady, 246 N.C. 613. G.S. 15-177.1 has no application to the facts of this case.

Appeal dismissed.

State v. Hairston
247 N.C. 395

Case Details

Name
State v. Hairston
Decision Date
Dec 11, 1957
Citations

247 N.C. 395

Jurisdiction
North Carolina

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!