Motion dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
33 N.Y.2d 684
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Rust Engineering Co. et al., Defendants. GAF Corp., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J. G. White Engineering Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Submitted September 10, 1973;
decided October 11, 1973.
D. Bruce Grew, III for motion.
George L. Ingalls opposed.
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Rust Engineering Co.
33 N.Y.2d 684
Case Details
33 N.Y.2d 684
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!