19 Cust. Ct. 233

Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc. v. United States

No. 7359.

Invoices dated Hanley, England, August 1944, etc.

Certified August 1944, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., October 5, 1944, etc.

Entry Nos. 708178; 758885.

(Decided August 14, 1947)

Siegel, Mandell & Davidson (Sidney Mandell of counsel) for the plaintiff.

Paul P. Bao, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*234Johnson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc. v. United States
19 Cust. Ct. 233

Case Details

Name
Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date
Aug 14, 1947
Citations

19 Cust. Ct. 233

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!